Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (9)
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (9) (entfernen)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- nein (9)
Schlagworte
- Rückenschmerz (3)
- Sport (3)
- sports (3)
- Leistungssportler (2)
- Prävention (2)
- Sportverletzung (2)
- exercise (2)
- perturbation (2)
- Bestäuber (1)
- Biofeedback-Therapie (1)
- Biomonitoring (1)
- Chronischer Schmerz (1)
- Epidemiologie (1)
- Insekten (1)
- Klimaänderung (1)
- Kreuzschmerz (1)
- LBP (1)
- LTER (1)
- Leistung (1)
- MiSpEx (1)
- Rehabilitation (1)
- Risikofaktor (1)
- Rumpf (1)
- Sensomotorik (1)
- Sportler (1)
- Stabilisierung (1)
- Training (1)
- Trainingsprogramm (1)
- chronic low back pain (1)
- chronic non-specific low back pain (1)
- climate change (1)
- complaints (1)
- core (1)
- disability (1)
- ecological gradients (1)
- epidemiology (1)
- exergame (1)
- health technologies (1)
- injury prevention program (IPP) (1)
- injury prevention programs (IPP) (1)
- insect monitoring (1)
- land cover (1)
- malaise trap (1)
- motor control exercises (1)
- non-specifc (1)
- overuse injuries (1)
- pain intensity (1)
- performance (1)
- pollinator (1)
- rehabilitation (1)
- risk factors (1)
- sensorimotor training (1)
- sports-related injuries (1)
- stabilization exercise (1)
- symptoms (1)
- thermal performance (1)
- training intervention (1)
- trunk stability (1)
- Überlastungsschaden (1)
- Übung (1)
- Übungsprogramm (1)
Institut
Study design: Systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Background and objectives: We systematically reviewed and delineated the existing evidence on sustainability effects of motor control exercises on pain intensity and disability in chronic low back pain patients when compared with an inactive or passive control group or with other exercises. Secondary aims were to reveal whether moderating factors like the time after intervention completion, the study quality, and the training characteristics affect the potential sustainability effects.
Methods: Relevant scientific databases (Medline, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane) were screened. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: All RCTs und CTs on chronic (≥ 12/13 weeks) nonspecific low back pain, written in English or German and adopting a longitudinal core-specific/stabilizing sensorimotor control exercise intervention with at least one pain intensity and disability outcome assessment at a follow-up (sustainability) timepoint of ≥ 4 weeks after exercise intervention completion.
Results and conclusions: From the 3,415 studies that were initially retrieved, 10 (2 CTs & 8 RCTs) on N = 1081 patients were included in the review and analyses. Low to moderate quality evidence shows a sustainable positive effect of motor control exercise on pain (SMD = -.46, Z = 2.9, p < .001) and disability (SMD = -.44, Z = 2.5, p < .001) in low back pain patients when compared to any control. The subgroups’ effects are less conclusive and no clear direction of the sustainability effect at short versus mid versus long-term, of the type of the comparator, or of the dose of the training is given. Low quality studies overestimated the effect of motor control exercises.
Introduction: Injury prevention programs (IPPs) are an inherent part of training in recreational and professional sports. Providing performance-enhancing benefits in addition to injury prevention may help adjust coaches and athletes’ attitudes towards implementation of injury prevention into daily routine. Conventional thinking by players and coaches alike seems to suggest that IPPs need to be specific to one’s sport to allow for performance enhancement. The systematic literature review aims to firstly determine the IPPs nature of exercises and whether they are specific to the sport or based on general conditioning. Secondly, can they demonstrate whether general, sports-specific or even mixed IPPs improve key performance indicators with the aim to better facilitate long-term implementation of these programs?
Methods: PubMed and Web of Science were electronically searched throughout March 2018. The inclusion criteria were randomized control trials, publication dates between Jan 2006 and Feb 2018, athletes (11–45 years), injury prevention programs and included predefined performance measures that could be categorized into balance, power, strength, speed/agility and endurance. The methodological quality of included articles was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration assessment tools.
Results: Of 6619 initial findings, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. In addition, reference lists unearthed a further 6 studies, making a total of 28. Nine studies used sports specific IPPs, eleven general and eight mixed prevention strategies. Overall, general programs ranged from 29–57% in their effectiveness across performance outcomes. Mixed IPPs improved in 80% balance outcomes but only 20–44% in others. Sports-specific programs led to larger scale improvements in balance (66%), power (83%), strength (75%), and speed/agility (62%).
Conclusion: Sports-specific IPPs have the strongest influence on most performance indices based on the significant improvement versus control groups. Other factors such as intensity, technical execution and compliance should be accounted for in future investigations in addition to exercise modality.