InDi - Institut für Internationale und Digitale Kommunikation
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (7)
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (7)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- nein (7)
Schlagworte
- COVID-19 (6)
- Pandemie (6)
- Covid-19 pandemic (4)
- public health (3)
- Gesundheitsschutz (2)
- pandemic (2)
- Asylrecht (1)
- Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (1)
- Corpus linguistics and the description of English (1)
- Datenschutz (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Englisch (1)
- Ethik (1)
- European Union (1)
- European pact on migration and asylum (1)
- Europäische Union (1)
- Gesellschaftsrecht (1)
- Gesundheitswesen (1)
- Hans Lindquist (1)
- Impfung (1)
- Innerstaatliches Recht (1)
- Insolvenzrecht (1)
- Konkurs (1)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (1)
- Lehrbuch (1)
- Luxembourg (1)
- Luxemburg (1)
- Magnus Levin (1)
- Menschenrecht (1)
- Migration (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Rezension (1)
- Selbstbestimmungsrecht (1)
- Solidarität (1)
- South Africa (1)
- Südafrika (1)
- Verfassung (1)
- bankruptcy epidemic (1)
- company law (1)
- compulsory vaccination pandemic (1)
- consent (1)
- emergency legislations (1)
- freedom of trade (1)
- fundamental right (1)
- global solidarity (1)
- government grants (1)
- human rights (1)
- insolvency law (1)
- lifeboat ethics (1)
- occupation (1)
- personal data protection (1)
- profession (1)
- public health-technology (1)
- relational autonomy (1)
- relational embodied ethics of the commons (1)
- right to medical self-determination (1)
- state health protection (1)
- sustainability (1)
- the commons (1)
Institut
- InDi - Institut für Internationale und Digitale Kommunikation (7) (entfernen)
This article discusses ethics in times of pandemic crisis (COVID-19) taking into consideration the sustainability paradigm. Two related ethical approaches are discussed and contrasted. On the one hand, the relational embodied ethics of the commons is discussed in the background of the pandemic of COVID-19. On the other hand, "lifeboat ethics" is interpreted in considering the pandemic situation. The main goal of the article is to compare the two ethical approaches as a way of dealing with our shared predicament in times of a pandemic, a state of exception, and based on that, to additionally derive conclusions about their application in further crises in the Anthropocene, whereby the primacy of sustainability is presumed.