The following collection of manuscripts emerged from an interdisciplinary virtual exchange held during the Winter semester of 2023/2024 at the Environmental Campus Birkenfeld, organized by Prof. Dr. Milena Valeva and Prof. Dr. Kathrin Nitschmann. Additionally, Prof. Dr. Héctor Bombiella Medina, a lecturer of anthropology in the Department of World Languages and Cultures at Iowa State University, contributed to the virtual exchange and supervised case studies 3 and 4, bringing his extensive experience in this field and facilitating the international exchange. Within the elective module on Human Rights, students from the Bachelor's programs "Nonprofit and NGO Management" and "Environmental and Business Law," as well as the Master's program "Energy and Corporate Law," explored the interconnections between human rights and sustainability. In an era marked by unprecedented environmental challenges and profound social transformations, the intersection of human rights and the rights of nature has emerged as a critical area of inquiry and debate. Today, as we face the dual crises of climate change and biodiversity loss, the traditional boundaries between human and environmental rights are increasingly blurred. This confluence demands a fresh, interdisciplinary approach to understanding and addressing the complex and interrelated issues at hand. Human rights, fundamental to the dignity and freedom of individuals, are deeply impacted by environmental degradation. Communities worldwide are experiencing firsthand the devastating effects of polluted air, contaminated water, and deforested landscapes, all of which undermine basic human rights to health, livelihood, and well-being. Conversely, recognizing the rights of nature — the intrinsic value of ecosystems and species — challenges us to reconsider our legal, ethical, and philosophical frameworks. It calls for a paradigm shift from a view to one that embraces the interconnectedness of all life forms. Engaging in robust discussions and research on these topics is essential in today's context. By exploring interdisciplinary perspectives, we can forge innovative solutions that honor both the rights of individuals and the integrity of nature. This special issue aims to contribute to this vital discourse, providing insights and fostering dialogue on how we can collectively navigate the complex landscape of human rights and environmental sustainability. The first chapter „Human rights and SDGs in the context of democracy“ examines the significance of international human rights in today's context and links them to new value systems like sustainability. The second chapter, the case study „Rights of Nature“ explores the concept of granting legal rights to nature itself by comparing laws from various countries to show how it combats environmental exploitation. The third chapter, the case study „Traditional coca leaf consumption and drug trafficking in Colombia“ delves into the complex issues surrounding coca cultivation in Colombia, highlighting its economic, social, and political impacts. The fourth chapter, the case study „The artisanal fishing community of Chorrillos, Peru“ aims to provide theoretical insights and recommendations for improving the livelihoods of artisanal fishing communities in Peru, considering legal, ethical, and environmental perspectives as well as how economic liberalization, privatization, and deregulation affect the community's socio-economic conditions. Content: CHAPTER 1 - Conceptual: Human rights and SDGs in the context of democracy Milena Valeva: From Human Dignity and Human Rights to Sustainability within the context of Democracy Yannick Sebastian Wagner: The relationship between the SDGs, human rights, and Catholicism in the United States, on health-related issues Christine Wetter: Comparison of Human Rights and Sustainable Development Goals Jacob Mayer: The challenges and opportunities of liberal democracies in promoting international value systems Pauline Nicolay: Effective conflict resolution through ADRs: opportunities, challenges and applications in different contexts CHAPTER 2 - Case Study: Rights of Nature Kathrin Nitschmann: Ecology and the protection of fundamental rights: status quo and development potential in the light of the precautionary principle" Johannes Hagemann: Decoding the Environmental Crisis: A Historical Analysis of Human-Nature Relationships Sahar Mallak: Rights for Nature in selected states Nergiz Dogan: Rights for Nature in Germany CHAPTER 3 - Case Study: Traditional coca leaf consumption and drug trafficking in Colombia Héctor Andrés Bombiella Medina: Prologue Cara-Maxine Heyd: Affected Human Rights by the destruction of coca plantations Maxi-Mercedes Jahn: Glyphosat[e] use in line with the peace policy Colombia Daniel Förster: Coca Cultivation in Colombian Economy – Considering the 2007 US-Colombian Free Trade Agreement CHAPTER 4 - Case Study: The artisanal fishing community of Chorrillos Peru Dorothea Hensing: Artisanal fisheries in circumstances with political framework and comanagement Nina Giordano: Traditional ecological knowledge – a key element of sustainable development Yasmin Krami: Strategy to promote the Human Right to an adequate standard of living for Peruvian artisanal fishers according to Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

The goal of this contribution is to provide an overview of the conceptual connections between the constructs of human rights, sustainability, and democracy, emphasizing the historically significant role of human dignity. This overview serves as an overarching introduction to the students’ articles in Chapter One, which explore selected relationships between these concepts. One main assumption of this overview is that the concept of human dignity is central to the institution of human rights, and human rights are instrumental in ensuring human dignity. Another key assumption relates to democracy, which is viewed as the framework for shaping human dignity, human rights, and sustainability. This article first focuses on the relationship between sustainability and democracy. It then analyzes the links between human dignity and human rights, followed by a discussion on the connections between human dignity and sustainability, and between human rights and sustainability. Finally, it concludes with an examination of the triangle formed by human dignity, human rights, and sustainability within the context of democracy, emphasizing the crucial roles of human agency and the rights of nature. Clarifying these links is essential for future empirical research to develop specific practical recommendations for sustainability transformation, including human rights, within a democratic context.

This article discusses ethics in times of pandemic crisis (COVID-19) taking into consideration the sustainability paradigm. Two related ethical approaches are discussed and contrasted. On the one hand, the relational embodied ethics of the commons is discussed in the background of the pandemic of COVID-19. On the other hand, "lifeboat ethics" is interpreted in considering the pandemic situation. The main goal of the article is to compare the two ethical approaches as a way of dealing with our shared predicament in times of a pandemic, a state of exception, and based on that, to additionally derive conclusions about their application in further crises in the Anthropocene, whereby the primacy of sustainability is presumed.

This issue presents the contributions of the participants of the international DAAD Blended Mobility Project “Giving nature its own rights - ethical and legal perspectives and the influence on the realization of selected SDGs” which took place in wintersemester 2025 at Trier University of Applied Science, Environmental Campus Birkenfeld (UCB) under the guidance of Prof. Valeva and Prof. Nitschmann and in collaboration with the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru and the University of Coimbra supported by Prof. Zegarra (PUCP) and Prof. Aragão (University of Coimbra). The DAAD funded project used the concept of global education to strengthen students' democratic competences and social participation and integrates intercultural dimensions into teaching. Its content is in the context of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and is linked to the curricular content of the studies “Non-Profit Management”, “Environmental Economics and Environmental Law” and “Sustainable Business and Technology” at the UCB. As part of the project, students and professors from Peru and Portugal visited the UCB for a workshop week in the winter semester 2024/25. Understanding and methods for interpreting the global agenda of the UN regarding the SDGs were developed within the framework of this ESD project. Students worked together in teams virtually and in person under the guidance of experts to critically evaluate existing anthropocentric systems and their imbalances and to develop strategies for overcoming the challenges of an ecocentered approach for the law and the system in general (institutions, companies, civil society). Ahead of the mobility phase and the technical content on the SDGs and diverse Rights of Nature (RoN) perspectives, language and culture were key themes in the two virtual kick-off events. This approach made it possible to raise transcultural and ecological awareness and thus paves the way for interdisciplinary knowledge building in teams. The intense mobility week started off with creating international mixed teams which were the work groups for the whole week. Input was given by experts within moderated panel discussions referring to different perspectives such as ethics and society and law and culture. The project focused on the Hunsrück-Hochwald National Park as a natural entity and local example, serving as a starting point for case studies from selected countries to provide a broad basis for interpreting SDGs 13, 14, 15, and 16. Students were introduced to the biodiversity of the park by an expert ranger and used it as an experience-oriented and stimulating place to experience the intelligence of nature. To perform a well-prepared simulated parliament debate, four internationally composed teams were defined, whereby a particular real case study in the area of RoN was assigned to two teams. The preparation of the debate included the assignment of the debate’s roles to the team’s members and clarification of the functions of the given roles. The material preparation included research for and discussion about the relevant information, and the training of the argumentation scenarios. They prepared themselves or two possible scenarios: confirmation of the launching of RoN or rejection of it. The two case studies were defined as follows: 1. Grant legal rights to the Maranon River, demanding its protection as a rights-bearing entity, now! 2. Grant the status of a subject of rights to the little fox “Run Run”, now! The debate concept allowed the students to transfer their theoretic knowledge in practical skills and thus contributes to the learning outcome of defending democratic values by contributing actively in democratic processes. With the idea to perpetuate the outcome of the project this issue publishes the student works related to the final debate and is completed by professors’ perspectives. Content: CHAPTER 1 – Theoretical Impulses and Panel Discussions within the DAAD Rights of Nature Project 2024 (Report) Alexandra Aragão: Foundations for a theory of radical legal eco-innovation: the paradigm of Rights of Nature Milena Valeva: Panel Discussion on Democracy, Rights of Nature and Social Norm Dynamics Kathrin Nitschmann: Researching the problem: Would an Rights of Nature Concept be THE solution? Nina Giordano: The Te Awa Tupua Act: How Nature’s Legal Standing Strengthens Indigenous and Human Rights CHAPTER 2 – Part I – Case Study: Granting legal rights to the Maranon River as a rights-bearing entity Lynette Annau: Granting Rights to Naturals Objects: The Future of Environmental Protection or Cultural Mismatch? Jesus Bernal: Anthropocentrism – an Obstacle to the Protection of Nature Malika Arstan: Economic Advantages of Granting the Rights of Nature Claudia Rocio Crespo Chavez: Is Europe Ready to Embrace the Recognition of Nature’s Rights? CHAPTER 2 – Part II – Case Study: Granting legal rights to the Maranon River as a rights-bearing entity Ana Murhiel Diaz Aguilar: Going to the Court doesn’t ensure that the environment will be protected Lilly Roth: Legal Instruments to Protect the Environment outside of Rights of Nature Tobias Becker: Public Support and Challenges in Recognizing the Rights of Nature: A European Perspective Maria J. Paixão: Legal Fetishism in Times of Polycrisis CHAPTER 3 – Part I – Case Study: Granting a Status of a Subject of Rights to the Peruvian Little Fox “Run Run” Jamie Moser: The Case of Run Run and the Emergence of a Nature – Centered Legal Framework José Heleno P. Vanzeler: Ecological Awareness and the Power of Law in Realizing the Rights of Nature Roya Qazen: From the Rights of Man to the Social Contract for Geoethics toward the Rights of Nature Amanda Erin Regalado Romero: Foundations for the recognition of the Rights of Nature in the European Union CHAPTER 3 – Part II – Case Study: Granting a Status of a Subject of Rights to the Peruvian Little Fox “Run Run” Ronald Sebastián Yaipén Polo: The Rights of Nature: The Answer to a Poorly Framed Debate Maria Eduarda Terra e Zeitune: Economic Challenges and the Rights of Nature: A Conflict Between Sustainable Growth and Environmental Conservation Yannick Wagner: Culture matters – Why the Rights of Nature don't fit the European Union

This article discusses ethics in times of pandemic crisis (COVID-19) taking into consideration the sustainability paradigm. Two related ethical approaches are discussed and contrasted. On the one hand, the relational embodied ethics of the commons is discussed in the background of the pandemic of COVID-19. On the other hand, "lifeboat ethics" is interpreted in considering the pandemic situation. The main goal of the article is to compare the two ethical approaches as a way of dealing with our shared predicament in times of a pandemic, a state of exception, and based on that, to additionally derive conclusions about their application in further crises in the Anthropocene, whereby the primacy of sustainability is presumed.