Tilman Engel, Daniel Niederer, Adamantios Arampatzis, Winfried Banzer, Heidrun Beck, Philipp Flößel, Thore Haag, Steffen Müller, Marcus Schiltenwolf, Hendrik Schmidt, Christian Schneider, Dirk Stengel, Josefine Stoll, Pia-Maria Wippert, Frank Mayer
- Objectives: To investigate the feasibility and effects of a sensorimotor stabilization exercise intervention with and without behavioral treatment in nonspecific low back pain.
Design: A three-armed multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Five study sites across Germany (3 orthopedic university outpatient clinics, 1 university sports medicine department, and 1 clinical institution).
Participants: Six hundred and sixty-two volunteers (N=662) (59% females, age 39±13y) with low back pain.
Interventions: Sensorimotor training (SMT), sensorimotor training with behavioral therapy (SMT+BT), and usual care group (UCG; continuation of the already ongoing individual treatment regime). Intervention groups performed a 12-week (3wk center-based, 9wk home-based) program.
Main Outcome Measures: Adherence, dropout rates, adverse events, and intervention effects on pain intensity, disability, and trunk torque (gain scores, repeated measures analysis of variance, α-level<0.05).
Results: In total, 220 participants received SMT, 222 received SMT+BT, and 170 were analyzed as UCG. Dropout rates were 10% for SMT and SMT+BT at week 3, 31% and 30% at week 4, and 49% and 50% at week 12. Adherence rates above 80% were reached in both interventions; 134 adverse events occurred. Intervention effects compared to UCG were found for pain intensity (SMT, P=.011, effect size d=0.41), disability (SMT+BT, P=.020, d=0.41), and peak torque (SMT, P=.045, d=0.38; SMT+BT, P=.019, d=0.44), with overall small effect sizes.
Conclusions: Participants were highly adherent to the sensorimotor exercise, but showed increased dropout rates, particularly during home-based training. Both interventions proved to be feasible, and although only SMT showed an increased effect on pain intensity compared to UCG, the SMT+BT showed positive effects on disability. Both interventions led to increases in strength, indicative of a neuromuscular adaptation.
MetadatenAuthor: | Tilman Engel, Daniel Niederer, Adamantios Arampatzis, Winfried Banzer, Heidrun Beck, Philipp Flößel, Thore Haag, Steffen Müller, Marcus Schiltenwolf, Hendrik Schmidt, Christian Schneider, Dirk Stengel, Josefine Stoll, Pia-Maria Wippert, Frank Mayer |
---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:tr5-10362 |
---|
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100430 |
---|
Parent Title (English): | Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation |
---|
Publisher: | Elsevier |
---|
Document Type: | Article (specialist journals) |
---|
Language: | English |
---|
Date of OPUS upload: | 2025/05/26 |
---|
Date of first Publication: | 2025/03/07 |
---|
Publishing University: | Hochschule Trier |
---|
Release Date: | 2025/05/26 |
---|
Tag: | Adherence; Back pain; Behavioral; Behavioral intervention; Disability; Exercise; Exercise intervention; Exercise therapy; Feasibility; Functional assessment; Pain intensity; Peak force; Rehabilitation; Sensorimotor; Stabilization |
---|
GND Keyword: | Kreuzschmerz; Bewegungstherapie; Rehabilitatives Training; Sensomotorik; Stabilisierung; Kontrollierte klinische Studie |
---|
Volume: | 7 |
---|
Issue: | 1 |
---|
Article Number: | 100430 |
---|
First Page: | 1 |
---|
Last Page: | 11 |
---|
Departments: | FB Informatik + Therapiewissenschaft |
---|
Dewey Decimal Classification: | 6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit |
---|
Licence (German): | Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International |
---|