• search hit 8 of 284
Back to Result List

Culture matters - Why the Rights of Nature don't fit the European Union

  • [AI generated:] This article explores the cultural dependencies and symbolic nature of the Rights of Nature (RoN) within the context of the European Union (EU). It argues that the successful implementation of RoN in regions like New Zealand and Ecuador is deeply rooted in indigenous cultural perspectives, which contrast sharply with the anthropocentric legal frameworks prevalent in Western industrialized nations. The article highlights how the recognition of non-human entities as legal subjects in these countries is often a socio-political strategy rather than a genuine shift towards ecocentrism. The case of illegal gold mining in Ecuador exemplifies the ongoing dominance of anthropocentric perspectives, where economic interests frequently undermine environmental protections. In contrast, the EU's approach to environmental justice is shaped by a lack of indigenous populations and the complexities of transposing EU law into national legislation. The EU primarily focuses on ecosystem services, emphasizing the necessity of environmental protection for human survival rather than granting rights to nature. This anthropocentric viewpoint is further reflected in societal attitudes towards environmental policies, where fears of economic disadvantage and social conflict hinder acceptance of transformative measures. The article concludes that the global community is at a historic crossroads regarding ecological transformation, emphasizing the need for culturally sensitive approaches to avoid social resistance. In cultures where the protection of natural entities aligns with spiritual beliefs, RoN could be beneficial if implemented meaningfully. However, in EU countries where spirituality is diminishing and indigenous populations are scarce, adopting RoN may risk alienating the public and exacerbating political divisions. Therefore, enhancing existing environmental legislation is crucial to foster trust in its effectiveness and fairness, ensuring that vulnerable populations are not disproportionately affected.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Yannick Wagner
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:tr5-10772
Parent Title (English):Journal of International and Digital Communication: Sustainability Perspectives
Publisher:Hochschule Trier, Umwelt-Campus Birkenfeld, Fachbereich Umweltwirtschaft/Umweltrecht - Institut für Internationale und Digitale Kommunikation
Place of publication:Hoppstädten-Weiersbach
Document Type:Article (specialist journals)
Language:English
Date of OPUS upload:2025/10/08
Date of first Publication:2025/10/08
Publishing University:Hochschule Trier
Release Date:2025/10/08
GND Keyword:Umweltpolitik; Umweltschutz; Umweltrecht; Natur; Recht; Kultur; EU; Europa; Anthropozentrismus
Volume:3
Issue:1
First Page:154
Last Page:159
Departments:FB Umweltwirtschaft/-recht (UCB)
Institute / InDi - Institut für Internationale und Digitale Kommunikation
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht
Journals:Zeitschrift für internationale und digitale Kommunikation: Nachhaltigkeitsperspektiven - Journal of International and Digital Communication: Sustainability Perspectives (JIDC) / JIDC, Vol. 3 (2025) / JIDC, Vol. 3, Issue 1 (2025)
Licence (German):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY-NC - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell 4.0 International

$Rev$