TY - JOUR A1 - Ayad, Ahmad A1 - Hallawa, Ahmed A1 - Peine, Arne A1 - Martin, Lukas A1 - Begic Fazlic, Lejla A1 - Dartmann, Guido A1 - Marx, Gernot A1 - Schmeink, Anke T1 - Predicting abnormalities in laboratory values of patients in the intensive care unit using different deep learning models: Comparative study T2 - JMIR Medical Informatics N2 - Background: In recent years, the volume of medical knowledge and health data has increased rapidly. For example, the increased availability of electronic health records (EHRs) provides accurate, up-to-date, and complete information about patients at the point of care and enables medical staff to have quick access to patient records for more coordinated and efficient care. With this increase in knowledge, the complexity of accurate, evidence-based medicine tends to grow all the time. Health care workers must deal with an increasing amount of data and documentation. Meanwhile, relevant patient data are frequently overshadowed by a layer of less relevant data, causing medical staff to often miss important values or abnormal trends and their importance to the progression of the patient’s case. Objective: The goal of this work is to analyze the current laboratory results for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and classify which of these lab values could be abnormal the next time the test is done. Detecting near-future abnormalities can be useful to support clinicians in their decision-making process in the ICU by drawing their attention to the important values and focus on future lab testing, saving them both time and money. Additionally, it will give doctors more time to spend with patients, rather than skimming through a long list of lab values. Methods: We used Structured Query Language to extract 25 lab values for mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU from the MIMIC-III and eICU data sets. Additionally, we applied time-windowed sampling and holding, and a support vector machine to fill in the missing values in the sparse time series, as well as the Tukey range to detect and delete anomalies. Then, we used the data to train 4 deep learning models for time series classification, as well as a gradient boosting–based algorithm and compared their performance on both data sets. Results: The models tested in this work (deep neural networks and gradient boosting), combined with the preprocessing pipeline, achieved an accuracy of at least 80% on the multilabel classification task. Moreover, the model based on the multiple convolutional neural network outperformed the other algorithms on both data sets, with the accuracy exceeding 89%. Conclusions: In this work, we show that using machine learning and deep neural networks to predict near-future abnormalities in lab values can achieve satisfactory results. Our system was trained, validated, and tested on 2 well-known data sets to ensure that our system bridged the reality gap as much as possible. Finally, the model can be used in combination with our preprocessing pipeline on real-life EHRs to improve patients’ diagnosis and treatment. KW - anomaly detection KW - DNN KW - time series classification KW - lab values KW - ICU KW - CNN KW - medical informatics KW - EHR KW - machine learning KW - lightGBM KW - Intensivstation KW - Medizinische Informatik KW - Elektronische Patientenakte KW - Laborparameter KW - Anomalie KW - Anomalieerkennung KW - Maschinelles Lernen KW - Neuronales Netz KW - Rekursives neuronales Netz KW - Convolutional Neural Network Y1 - 2022 UR - https://hst.opus.hbz-nrw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/235 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:tr5-2357 VL - 10 IS - 8 SP - 1 EP - 17 PB - JMIR Publications ER -