TY - JOUR A1 - Baumgartner, Corinna A1 - Helmers, Eckard T1 - Life cycle assessment of electric kick scooters: consolidating environmental impact quantification and concluding climate-friendly use options T2 - Environmental Sciences Europe N2 - Background: The environmental impact of electric scooters has been the subject of critical debate in the scientific community for the past 5 years. The data published so far are very inhomogeneous and partly methodologically incomplete. Most of the data available in the literature suffer from an average bias of 34%, because end-of-life (EOL) impacts have not been modelled, reported or specified. In addition, the average lifetime mileage of shared fleets of e-scooters, as they are operated in cities around the world, has recently turned out to be much lower than expected. This casts the scooters in an unfavourable light for the necessary mobility transition. Data on impact categories other than the global warming potential (GWP) are scarce. This paper aims to quantify the strengths and weaknesses of e-scooters in terms of their contribution to sustainable transport by more specifically defining and extending the life cycle assessment (LCA) modelling conditions: the modelling is based on two genuine material inventories obtained by dismantling two different e-scooters, one based on a traditional aluminium frame and another, for the first time, based on plastic material. Results: This study provides complete inventory data to facilitate further LCA modelling of electric kick scooters. The plastic scooter had a 26% lower lifetime GWP than the aluminium vehicle. A favourable choice of electric motor promises a further reduction in GWP. In addition to GWP, the scooter's life cycles were assessed across seven other impact categories and showed no critical environmental or health impacts compared to a passenger car. On the other hand, only the resource extraction impact revealed clear advantages for electric scooters compared to passenger cars. Conclusions: Under certain conditions, scooters can still be an important element of the desired mobility transition. To assure a lifetime long enough is the crucial factor to make the electric scooter a favourable or even competitive vehicle in a future sustainable mobility system. A scooter mileage of more than 5400 km is required to achieve lower CO2eq/pkm emissions compared to passenger cars, which seems unlikely in today's standard use case of shared scooter fleets. In contrast, a widespread use of e-scooters as a commuting tool is modelled to be able to save 4% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the German mobility sector. KW - Life cycle assessment KW - Micro-mobility KW - Electric kick scooter KW - Carbon footprint KW - Environmental impact KW - Shared feet application greenhouse gases KW - Mobility mode KW - Global warming potential (GWP) KW - Umweltbilanz KW - CO2-Bilanz KW - Erwärmung KW - E-Scooter KW - Verkehrswende KW - Lebensdauer Y1 - 2024 UR - https://hst.opus.hbz-nrw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/984 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:tr5-9847 VL - 36 PB - BioMed Central ER -